We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Writing in the second decade of the sixteenth century, at the end of Florence's republican period, the historian and statesman Francesco Guicciardini gave systematic expression to a body of thought that had evolved out of the practice of Florentine oligarchic statesmen since the suppression of the Ciompi rebellion in 1378. In his early works such as the Discorso di Logrogno (1512) and the Florentine Histories (1508–9), but also in the more mature Dialogue on the Government of Florence (c. 1521–c. 1525), Guicciardini reflected upon and brought to a high degree of theoretical clarity this important strand of Florentine political opinion. Guicciardini's project was foreshadowed in the letters and hortatory writings of humanists like Leonardo Bruni, but it was rooted still more in the discussions and consultations on public matters that were a traditional part of Florentine political life. The records of such discussions disclose the attitudes behind the numerous efforts – some more successful than others – to change the legal, political, and institutional order of the city.
This tradition expressed the aspirations of a social class that sought to consolidate its predominance by setting itself apart as a formally recognized political class, uniquely entitled to the higher offices of the state. As such it was resisted by a popular opposition that appealed to traditional mores and claimed the authority of the hallowed medieval civic statutes.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.